April 06, 2011

recherce independent

Topic: Prenatal Maternal disposition

Bibliography Annotations:

1st Source:
I interviewed Blondel, the Gynecologist that delivered all my cousins and myself on my mothers side of the family. We discussed his patient’s family “rituals” in relation to patient’s age, desires and attitudes. There was a major focus on maternal attitude and outcomes of the delivery and the newborns medical condition. Most information was generalized based upon his years of practice, some was patient specific but ALL identities remained anonymous.

2nd Source:
I interviewed My Grandmother (mother of 3, last child was born: 1967), and My eldest Aunt (mother of 3, last child was born: 2008). We discussed how there pregnancies went, in correlation to there attitude and behaviors while pregnant. We also discussed the societal views of pregnancy, being married before, how most labors went, and media influences. I also interviewed my cousin (26) whom is planning to have a baby and her expectation and the belief of her capabilities when it comes to childbirth. In conclusion, a comparison of the 3 generations was conducted.

3rd Source:
Continuous education is needed in a lifestyle of health, and the younger it begins the better. Thus beginning with prenatal mannerisms including a balanced nutrition and maternal emotions and hormones. The studies conducted by the House of SH, multiple medical associations prove that having children in ones twenties and early thirties is optimal.

4th Source:
Physical conditions change as one increases in age. A study conducted with 4,130 white British women concluded that the optimal age to give birth is at the beginning of adulthood. This is because of the changing in fat locations and the activity of the reproduction and maintenance depots.

5th Source:
This paper explores the historical roots of the dorsal and lithotomic birthing positions. Stemming from the conflict in 1500 France between the prestige’s midwifes and mediocre obstetrics practice. This paper divulges the path of the emerging of such positions from inter-professional struggles. There has been questioning of the effectiveness of such birthing positions since 1882 and little has been done until now.

How this research can be developed:
Based on the collections aforementioned this could be expanded into a project evaluating the societal movement of having children later in life, versus having children at the optimal age. Questioning how our industrial society is effecting our biological predisposition. The interviews conducted are great evidence for how in the past century the advancing generations are changing their family values and child birthing “plans”. The medical studies are proof that early adulthood is the best time to have children because of ones body capabilities. Contrasted with industrialized societies expectations and “regulations” of having children later in life. Lastly the example of industrialized society affecting the facility of women giving birth can be also correlated with why we have children later in life even though it goes against our biological make up.

Bibliography:

1st Source:
Blondel, Dr. . Personal Interview by Eloise Flesh . 4/4/2011. 4 Apr 2011.

2nd Source:
Burdin, Claude , Florence Burdin, and Agathe Pillet . Personal Interview by Eloise Flesh . 4/2/2011. 2 Apr 2011

3rd Source:
"Schoolchildren, maternal nutrition and generating healthy brains: the importance of lifecycle education for fertility, health and peace.." pubmed.gov . House SH, 20/1/2009. Web. 4 Apr 2011. .

4th Source:
Wells , JC, L Griffin , and P Treleaven . "Independent changes in female body shape with parity and age: A life-history approach to female adiposity.." pubmed.gov. Childhood Nutrition Research Centre, 22/8/2010. Web. 3 Apr 2011. .

5th Source:
Dundes , Lauren . "The Evolution of Maternal Birthing Positions ." Public Health Then and Now 77.5 (1987): 636-41. Web. 4 Apr 2011. . (Dundes 636-41)

March 29, 2011

MEETING PEGGY !!!

So I am chilling in Union Square, a place where all us grimy filthy rats don’t seem to bother me. I sit with joy on the grime soaked steps; what came to follow was a miracle. I saw Peggy Vincent across the way spinning on her head while smoking a j at the same time. This is when my interest in her turned into infatuation, so I decided to give her a heart felt praise about her book.

“Hey girrrrl! I loved your book, Baby Catcher. Your belief that "Childbirth is normal, until proven otherwise." and different for every women, inspired me. Your chronicle of being a mid-wife really made me realize the overwhelming percentage of un-natural childbirths that occur in America is oppressing women. This made me re-evaluate American culture for the ump-teenth time, further questioning how else we dis-empower women."

"OH SNAP, thanks! That means sooooo much to me! Gee-wilikeers, what was your favorite part?"

"Well I am currently up to the second third of the book where you are deliberating the impact of being a lone practicing mid-wife upon being a mother, and an array of different birthing stories. I find this part of the book further develops your beliefs stated in the first third of the book. For real though I found when your wrote, “I’d been avoiding the central point of intensity, staying on the brink of the primitive surrender that’s required to get a stubborn baby out. I’d talked hundreds of women into taking that leap of faith, that shut-your-eyes-and-jump moment of bravery. Like a girl standing on the high dive, walking back and forth the length of the board, shivering, going to the brink again to stare down into the water so far below—and then she’s off, airborne. Free. With sudden clarity, I knew it would have to hurt more before it got better. I wouldn’t be able to circumvent the pain. I had to go through it, enter willingly into the void, holding nothing back. I had to jump off the diving board.” (138) To be the climax of book! You really express the empowerment of women versus being in the back seat when you are describing the duties of your job. It really gave me a real sense of sisterhood. The understanding as to why women have the character we do, and why we can be so strong minded. Later you state ”The woman’s eyebrows had shot up when she heard me use the words “placenta” and “vagina” without whispering. Like many midwives, I’m inclined to discuss casually topics that most other people never hear mentioned outside of a doctors office.” (153) I found this to be great evidence to the fear and disapproval women have fostered of there own bodies. Sunning the organs, and life providers of our race. The fact that what makes us females, should be whispered so no one can hear. I found this sad and sickening but important to acknowledge. I find it similar to the fact that when one watches television and they are shooting those RIDICULOUS pad commercials, to prove the absorbency they drop water with blue food coloring, NOW why the heck isn't it red, like we all know it is?! Later you stated “I felt like offering drugs to a laboring woman sent a message that she wasn’t handling labor well, and I didn’t want to impose those feelings”(187) I found this to be the proof of how the institutions do not support our women, versus discourage them."

"But what could I have done to make this a better book - that would more effectively fulfill its mission?"

Well, let's be clear - your text sought to provide narratives, and a little journalistic/policy analysis from the perspective of a mid-wife for the book-reading-public to better understand pregnancy & birth in our culture. Given that aim, and your book, I would say; Give a more grueling image of birth, utterly describing every inch. To provide the reader of a clear image of what a baby looks like when crowning, I think such images would help the readers connect to the moment with depth. I would also attempt to avoid Cartoonzation of the issues, and situations. Lastly I would exaggerate the text a little less, a lot of the use of dialogue seems like cliché to simply convey your point. But I don't want you to feel like I'm criticizing. I really commemorate you for putting such labor into such an important topic FOR WOMEN, for making ME think about my capability as a women and the attitude I might have when giving birth. Your text really validated my instinctual desire to have a baby and I really question how my character might change during labor. I also find myself innately thinking of my animalistic intent every time I see a baby no matter where or how, I find myself thinking HOW CUTE, and observing women around me doing the same. The next question I‘ve been pondering in result of reading your text is why are we in such denial that we are animals? I feel that the rudimentary disapproval of natural childbirth, being “to posh to push” is the ultimate attempt to cover up our true, wild gory, strong, powerful traits. I also have come to the conclusion that Science is a religion. My conclusions from this came from the passages with the Christian Scientist. In result of reading your book I am trying to be more positive when it comes to my health, and attempting to shy away from seeking with passion and intensity for health issues, because it is simply leading me to find what I am seeking. I am also highly considering not visiting an oncologist unless absolutely necessary, I mean if they don’t support vaginal birth then why would they support me as a woman in there normal practice?"

"Thanks a lot young lady! You New Yorkers sure know what ya’gotta say. Have a nice day "

“THANK-YOU.. ADIOS”

And so I returned to my grime induced steps and merged into my imaginary pregnancy.

March 22, 2011

HW #39

Vincent, Peggy. Baby Catcher : Chronicles of a Modern Midwife. 1st. New York, NY : Simon & Schuster, 2002. 1-326. Print.


1.) Mainly Baby Catcher goes into the deep eerie blue depths of being a mid-wife. Peggy provides detailed story after story of the trials and tribulations of being a midwife. She illustrates the mothers emotions, the midwife's, that of the assistance and that of the labor and birth process. Versus The Business of Being Born that glimpses over the process contrasted with economical interstices behind hospital births. She also exemplifies the belief of the high importance of a support system surrounding the woman during birth, whereas the movies really just shows the baby being born and mostly skips of labor. Peggy creates a vigilant image that EVERY birth is different for every woman. Peggy includes the intricate list of items provided at a home birth (pg.328-329). Peggy also sheds light that a breech baby does not mean a necessary c-section, the child can be born vaginally but it is a delicate process. Peggy also describes a previous practice called the Leboyer Bath, which was introduced by a French doctor (Leboyer) that a baby should be placed in a warm bath right after birth. Peggy divulges with great detail the major popularity during the 70's of women taking charge of their health by going to the holistic extreme and creating hospital environments meeting their demand, simply by their change in daily life style creating a different demand. Vincent gives a different approach for the reasoning of doctor’s disapproval of home-births, stating that there belief: birth is a retrospective diagnosis until proved normal. They feel that they have gone to medical school to intervene and be of importance, versus the money guzzling approach which is inevitably tied in with a doctor's schooling but that is beside the point.

2.) "Childbirth is normal, until proven otherwise." - Peggy Vincent. I believe that this is true, but the way the author proves this is in a glorified cartoony, and exaggerated manner. I also believe normal is a very abstract term for such a statement, and she could also prove her belief with more insight if she truly described every detail of a baby coming out of a vagina; with the purpose of doing such as well.

3.)
• the beauty of vaginal birth (pg. 26)
• the facility in which teenagers give birth (pg. 103)
• bliss must come with pain (pg. 56)
• What in the hell is a "Christian scientist"? and why is birth so easy for them ? (pg. 111-113)
• Why does our society impede people without a certifications/college education, when the knowledge already exists? (Pg. 76)


4.) The author makes the claim that "The more rigid the birth plan, the higher the incidence of cesarean section." This claim is very hard to prove, I believe it is questioning the spiritual attitude of a women and probably why it has not been researched, emotions and science don't mix. I think the manner in which the evidence was used is valid because it comes from her personal experience as a midwife and is attempting to support the belief that a mother must be sure of her woman bodies' capabilities. Previously in the book she states the birth becomes complicated when the mother begins to think too much, versus letting her body take control. A Government Public health site states "it's important to be flexible — if you know one aspect of your birthing plan won't be met, be sure to weigh that aspect against your other wishes." This addresses the variety and un-predictability of the birth, divulging in the necessity of an open mind-frame trusting that the process will go well. The Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, at The Chinese University of Hong Kong, conducted a study on maternal fear associated with pregnancy the results concluded that "Regarding the various manifestations of fear, "stress symptoms" and "wish to avoid pregnancy and childbirth" ranked highest. Twenty-two percent of participants had considered requesting an elective cesarean section due to fear of childbirth." This exemplifies that many women non important the source are very fearful of giving birth so much so that they want to have a c-section. One could imply that if one's fear is un-consciously so strong that one does not even want to give birth it could lead to major complications. My last source is the African myth divulged in one of the birth books in class, stating that when women were unsure of their births they would have very serious birth complications, I myself find this a very reliable source in the context that these women gave birth alone in forest. Based on the research I have conducted this evidence is not per say FACT, but Theory and is valid in the context used.

BIBLIOGRAPHY
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17456465
http://kidshealth.org/parent/pregnancy_center/preparing_parenthood/birth_plans.html#
* she golrifies exagerates, carrtonizes, and does not give enough detail of the actual birth

March 15, 2011

HW #38

1. The way she has structured the book is oranized, logical, coherent, and supports her claim. She de-veils cesarean sections and machines, the pros and cons; discuss women's role in supporting such ceremonies, and then reveals the consequences of such actions. She begins by "attacking" the industry, and then reflects upon how women’s actions have lead to such outcomes.

2. What is the childbirth reality in the U.S.A, and what say are mothers-to-be granted as the center of this procedure?

why do doctors seek the necessity in their patients?
What does the contract a women sign’s when going into labor at a hospital state?


3.Childbirth is rapidly becoming industrialized; an event that the authority can "control", "predict", "charge", with the gift of convenience. Women are being pushed by mother culture, insurance companies, and doctors to follow the model procedure.

I believe what has been stated above is very true and very scary but I believe it is partially at faulty of the women for not taking control of her body. I think that pregnancy (like many other things in our culture) have become soo scientific and have lost the beauty of spiritual beliefs. Such as if the women are not sure of her pregnancy she will have a complicated birth. I think women should become more in-tuned with their connection with the "thing inside them", and less preoccupied with the ultrasound every week. I also believe humans are sooooooo scared of death and this is where most of this nonsense sprouts.

4. Women need to be empowered, given the resources to be knowledgeable about their body, since we seem to not trust them. Humanity, (including me & author) must understand the reality that we can only be in control to a certain extent, the rest is up to nature. Insurance companies & the government need to support women’s capability of Physiological birth. Women have the right to decide what medical procedures they want conducted. My personal ever lasting question, is WHAT ARE THE EFFECTS ON THE EMOTIONAL/MENTAL STATE OF BABY, and the babies relationship with mother when born with drugs, and does not receive immediate mother skin to skin contact?

5. The book is written like a newspaper article. The sources are derived from statistics, interviews with doctors/patients, historical books, and her own experiences (greatest-least). She uses all her quotes in a manner that seems very bias, not reveling the whole truth. All the sources are footnoted and a bibliography is in the back. The way she places information I am not sure how creditable it is for her manner of piecing things together, a jigsaw like manner. She uses A LARGE AMOUNT of statistical facts and a slight amount of interviewed evidence to back this up; and all her topics become redundant rapidly. Her style of writing is deprived of BEAUTY, and is quite trying for the reader!

March 02, 2011

hw #27

FEEDBACK FOR OTHERS
To Devin: Devin I think you made a very valid point, parents should really take into consideration the huge amounts of work that entail child care. I even neglected these thoughts with all my interviews. I like how you tied all your interviews back to the focal point that you grasped from your inquries. I want to know why you think women should have children when they are 30, their bodies can have them with more facility at a younger age. I think your strongest line was "Then she was told she had something called Maple Syrup Urine Disease (you can’t make this stuff up), which if not treated could cause coma and death for the baby.". I think that this line had great character and I could really hear your voice. I belive to make this part stronger you could have illustrated the point with more fluidity rather than just stating and then this happened and then this. I thought over all this was an interesting piece, you should just read over your work before publishing ! :D
_______________________________________________________________________________________
FEEDBACK TO ME
MENTOR: Loreli
Eloise! First my apologies for this post being late...my day blew up in my face and i just couldn't get to it until now.

For me the most stimulating point here is about the cost of childbirth...that a natural childbirth is less expensive than a medical one, yet our system pushes medicine and doctors and a less natural experience of birth. The thing is, as I mentioned in your last post, that every woman is different and honestly, I am sure that Carolina would not have lived (umbilical cord was around her neck), and Sofia may not have made it either, had we not been in a hospital, with a lot of medical intervention and surveillance. The other bit is that of our system...a big issue that you have been tracking down all year. The thing is that if our government has been hijacked by corporate bodies (which I believe it has), then our political actions are serving to make money, not take care of citizens. The French paradigm with job security, financial support, and five (!) days in the hospital to recover and rest sound like a utopian dream compared to our system, where a mother can be discharged a single day after delivering a baby, with very little education or practical guidance. It does feel that we have very much gotten away from the wisdom of the ages, that Bill so impressively continues to perpetuate. Great post, really interesting.

What is DSP?

I would love more exploration of what it is to "dis-empower", vs. simply not having empowerment as related to motherhood and the birthing experience.
________________________________________________________________________________________________
DEVIN: STUDENT
You wrote three highly detailed birthing posts. I found them all interesting but the first one was the zinger! Bill Hill is not your run of the mill midwife. I think your best line(and there were several of these)was, "When Bill speaks about the birthing of his wife he said,'she just pushed it out, but I did most of the work', when previously he had stated that if there aren't complications all there is to do is catch it. I believe such contradiction and prejudice towards the strength of his wife comes from the fact that she left 3 weeks after the birth of their second daughter." Its as though his wife said to him, "You did all the work so you keep them." It seems really tragic that she left him and her two babies. I'm sure has a point about hospitalsbeing a sometimes negative part of the "birthing industry." On the other hand, if there are complications, it's obviously better to be in a hospital. Even in this country, when a lot of poor people had babies at home, a lot of the mothers and babies died. The section about your own birth in France was really interesting too. My mother wishes she could have had my brother and me in France. The services are so good. She was lucky that she worked for the French American Foundation here when my brother was born and had a year of paid maternity leave. I think you wrote the way you talk, and this makes the writing lively. You just need to edit it more and I think you meant "relevant" when you said of "prevalent."

February 28, 2011

sistas & brothas

BILL HILL, the man is 65, wise, tough lover and a survivor. He has delivered 7 babies so far, 2 in Woodstock of which he said "I didn't know they were pregnant enough to have babies", his 2 daughters, 2 that had complications, and the last one to his neighbor Mary. Mary had her home birth secretly because doing such is illegal in New Orleans (along with 15 spectators, Bill says she started completely dressed but halfway ripped her clothes off with everyone there,” it’s natural ya know?"). Bill learned how to deliver babies through experience with cows, dogs, cats and reading one birthing book, simply observing the diagrams and noting the important signs of the mother’s status and that of the baby. "It's not rocket science, it’s nature." When Bill speaks about the birthing of his wife he said, "she just pushed it out, but I did most of the work", when previously he had stated if there aren't complications all there is to do is catch it. I believe such contradiction and prejudice towards the strength of his wife comes from the fact that she left 3 weeks after the birth of their second daughter. I found this prevalent to the analysis of Bill's point of view on such a subject because he became the mother and the father, he had to buy his daughters first bra in the middle of a snow storm because her nipples were showing. Bill was brought up his first 18 years of life in the foster care system (essentially a slave), this is interesting because he became a mother in such prevalent ways and so close to the process of women without ever having a mother or sister of his own. Bills second daughter was born with dislocated hips and he eventually found a hospital (the Shryner club) that was willing to aid in his daughter’s treatment (she grew to eventually have no effects of the birth complication, but had steel in between her feet for the first few months). Because of the abandonment of her mother Bill was desperate to find an alternative to formula for his daughter, and she was breast-fed by the neighbor for a whole year! (My grandpa’s mom when she had kids had HUGE amounts of breast milk, so she would pump and give the rest to the hospital) Bill says the most important factors of birth are insuring the baby is in the right position and is not wrapped by the umbilical cord, he has dealt with both of these issues. One of the babies head was wrapped by the umbilical cord so he pushed it back up, stuck his hand in her vagina, unwrapped it, and out the baby came. Mary from New Orleans was having great difficulty so he made her teas, drew a warm bath (with Epsom salt) in she went and 10 minutes later the baby came out, but his hand was by his head so he pushed him back in and then out he came. Bill says he's learned through sex and one book, that rubbing women’s nipples helps vastly with the facility of birthing. He also says what is very important is the after care; making sure the women hasn’t ripped, all the placenta is out, she is clean, and so is the baby. Bill says he hates the modern birthing industry and the manner in which hospitals complicate births and enforce their practicality and profit versus the comfort of the mother. He says cesareans are simply rushing the mothers, and alters the women’s body and experience when unnecessary. "old days it was the natural way, ya know". Bill says delivering a child is the most invigorating experience he has ever had, seeing the baby take its first breath, slapping it on the butt, wiping its nose, making sure it is okay, "not to many people get to do that". I find Bill is a great example of "with age comes wisdom". I respect him so very much, and for the short time I spent with him learned a lot and connected deeply. Bill ended saying two things I found very powerful "Life is a bunch of cycles, you cycle through it, then your gone." Describing birth and injustices created through mother culture "Just the start of a life, Just the start of a life, we just gotta break the cycle, we just gotta break the cycle." I believe the stories of each birth (which I did not write because of time restrains) were ultimately what stuck with me the most. The connection and struggle of the women that I could feel within me, the relation of the budding of a new organism to continue to sprout around all our influence. Of these Mary's was the most powerful, she was defying the state law in order to under go the most instinctual natural process and doing it with out the restraints of the industries. I could imagine it, a warm home glowing with light radiating from the mood and feelings of the 15 expectant lovers, radiating their feel along with the mother. Sitting with struggle, chained in by her clothing, embracing her skin tightly, struggle, more sweat, more pain. Ripping off her clothing, her beautiful brown body radiating of life, a tight stretched belly falling towards the ground, a beautiful back and smooth skin, a red and present face strutting around the house. This symbolized for me the ultimate women’s empowerment her being the center of attention because of her struggle in her most animal form naively being, not restricted by the pressures of society, with as many people as she desired supporting her. Bill's experience with birth completely defies that of most people in America, his relation with American women, and their process as well. Bill's view goes against the mainstream business of birthing.

RYAN MADOOR is 29-year-old women with 3 kids, 8&7 year old, and an 18-month year old. Ryan went through all the phases; she had a predominant American hospital birth, the first with epidural and patosen for enduced labor, the second only and epidural. Her last child was born all natural with a doula but was simply conducted in a hospital (the effects of her ever lasting fear instilled by society). Ryan says she remembers all her births equally and felt the same joy but felt EMPOWERMENT such that she could not put in words from her natural birth. She used breathing techniques, strattled her bed and would focus on a certain point and would breath as deeply as she possibly could into the pain letting it out through all her extremities. (I could imagine these women completely extended with each wave of energy and tension rushing through her body jaggedly but exiting with sensual calmness.) When she was fully dilated she gave birth standing up and they placed cushions beneath her to soften the crash of the child. In such an experience Ryan said she had a change of personality and learned allot about herself and her personal boundaries. With each birth of her children she progressively learned more and de-mystified the subject while learning more about herself. She said she felt society was trying to dis-empower the women and take such an experience and turn it into one of profit motive. The birth of her first child cost $13,000 the second $10,000 and the last $5,000. With her first birth she said the patosen freaked her our because she lost control of her emotions because of the rapid occurrence of her reaction in her body and was no longer in control, she also said their was no one to help coach her through the pain. With the second child she had strong feelings of excitement and less of fear and anticipation of the unknown but still felt repressed by the staffs response to her. She feels all the fears and stigmas she had against birth stemmed from mass medias strong structure of having to do A. B. C. D. with no option. She feels society builds in a fear factor for birth to create the dependency on the industry versus educating the mother. Ryan says she has a fear of having kids late and life and is one of the reasons she had them so young (she wants one more), she wants her children to have great-grandparents, wants to be able to run and play with her children. She questions the dominant social practice of having children later in life and wonders the effects it has on the child, and oddly the economy.

VALERIE BURDIN (MANMAN), this was an odd interview because my mother’s answers were quite dry and redundant for the most part. As far back as I can remember I would always ask my mother the story of my birth over and over, always asking something new. Yet it still gave me such as sense of joy and overpowering love and connection to my mother, such that her answers we dry because in a sense my body and unconscious thought knew the answers of these already. Not in concrete statable memories, but in that of emotion and feeling (the sense of being aware in which my bodies nerves move). My mother had me at 33 years old in St. Raphael a small town in the south of France. She surprisingly had a cesarean (even though she did all to avoid it by getting a homeopathic vaccine a month before, because she has a vaginal condition) because I was facing outwards instead of having my skull first. BOY WAS I ALERT ALREADY, READY TO BE NOTICED! (HAHAHA) The cesarean was not rushed or forced; it was simply done in a relaxed manner, after a while for the best of my health. During her cesarean the doctor (whom also delivered all my aunts, and cousins) narrated the event for my mother and then the nurse placed us head by head "on se embrase pour la premier foi"(to make out for the first time.. truly in-translatable like a lot of French). She says she did not read any books or buy any gadgets or extra preparing she says "ya pa de tous ca!" In France having a child is supported by the government, unlike America where it is practically discouraged! First the government covers everything, the mother can choose to give birth in a hospital or a clinic (the equivalent of a private hospital, smaller and less regulated). At the beginning of the 6th month of pregnancy the parents are given money every month, (first month she bought bed, next stroller, ect.) in France we do not have baby showers there is no need for everyone to help you with the expenses and cover it up with an exhausting stressful party for the mother. The mother receives a mid-wife, which conducts 3 lessons post birth to teach you the logistics, and is connected with the mother’s choice of doctor so they are exchanging information. The government suggests that you stay in the hospital for a minimum of 5 days so you can RELAX!!!! Over the course you learn how to breast feed, shower the baby so on. You are given the option to keep the baby in your room at night or they can keep the baby over night so the mother can get her rest. After your birth for the first 3 months the governments provides time off from work, paid full salary; the women receives more time if she is breast feeding. The government also provides for both parents a year off from work where you are only paid the minimum monthly wage, but your employer is obliged to take you back after your leave. The Government also has public nursery’s that have good prices so that if necessary their is the option to have a baby care taker. I focused on the logistics of government support because it shows the vast difference between America and France and exemplifies the cruelty and dis-empowerment placed upon women by the American system. Also seen with the comparison of Ryan's experience shows how mechanical and industrial the process becomes in America, just another business investment. Where as France even though an industrialized society supports the nature of a women and not being completely oblivious and suppressive to our animal habits.

Questions and main interest I have developed from these interviews are: How can we break the cycle? How has the DSP of having children later in life affected the women, child, and family’s life? How do the DSP’s in America around pregnancy and birth dis-empower women?

February 17, 2011

Generational Perspective


I interviewed 4 people, A whom is a 16-year-old female, C who is also a 16-year-old female, M a 15-year-old male, and B a 17-year-old male. I will elaborate upon patterns/dominating ideas, and illustrate unique and insightful prose. 

A stated that when she imagines birth she sees this painting in her head (http://www.studio-international.co.uk/studio-images/Kahlo/0042_b.asp), Frida Kahlo: Birth. I found this to be very intense and somewhat distributing and altered from the image of that of most. It portrays blood staining white sheets that almost give the image a sense of impurity. The mothers face is also covered, assuming she has died during labor, and lays at her vagina an adult proportioned head. I think it is a very mind altering view of birth and breaks the dominant view, of biblical, clean, and heavenly. M stated that he views birth as the ultimate symbol of vulnerability. I found this very interesting because such a quality is seen as unpleasant and undesired in our society, (one should not be open), yet most see the child’s dependency on the mother as intimate, nurturing and loving. Why do the standards of vulnerability alter as one age augments? 

A re-accruing "surface" thought of all the interviewees, is the aspect OF PAIN. How the women must suffer to have a child, a grueling experience, which intimidates one. C stated that as a child she dreamed of one day being pregnant, literally; hoping over night she would become pregnant and the following morning wake-up in labor. As her young mind became more tainted with what society thought now she is very worrisome about the act of one day giving birth. She feels the drugs will be nice to help her cope. M stated that he thinks hospital and home births are on opposite spectrums from artificial to natural. He does not have prejudice and believes it should happen however the women feel comfortable. He says especially for the women " who do not have a high tolerance for pain, drugs are very comforting". Our society has created a crutch for women to lean upon, a faulty notion that they are not strong enough to endure the process naturally and need to be helped. From a feminist point of view I see this as an attempt to take away women’s empowerment. I also think women are foolishly blinded by our culture, and let these artificial fears cloud their destiny. Women ARE MADE UP TO HAVE BABIES! WOMEN BACK IN THE DAY DID NOT TAKE DRUGS. 

Ironically, M states that he connects the vulnerability of birth with drug addicts whom are vulnerable because of their dependency on chemicals, and of people whom have been released from prison and are use to having a set schedule and then feel lost once released. Many women act to be vulnerable and rely on the allopathic crap. One must be clear that I myself have never had a child and am only speaking from my natural instincts and interpretations of what I hear and learn. I believe that a women who has used drugs to induce a child's birth, has more truth and value to her beliefs and opinions then that of my naive thoughts vagina, and uterus.